Enhanced Financial Recovery and
Equitable Retirement Treatment Act of 2007
S. 1729, H.R.
2878
Legislation
to improve the collection of
Title I - Debt
Collection Reform
·
The 93 United States Attorney Offices
are responsible for criminal and civil debt collection efforts that result
in billions of dollars a year and generate additional funds for federal agencies,
the Department of Justice and the victims of crime. From FY 2003 to FY 2006, US Attorney Offices
have collected an averaged over $4 billion a year, more than twice the total
budget of all USAOs. The FY 2006
statistical
report from DOJ provides detail on collection activities last year.
·
However, according to the Government Accountability Office, which has
criticized the Department of
Justice for deficiencies in the collection of civil and criminal judgments,
there are still tens billions of dollars left to be recovered, sums not collected
due to inefficiencies in the law and competing priorities.
·
Title I responds
to GAO’s criticism through the creation of reforms in the law governing Department
of Justice collection efforts to assure that civil and criminal offenders
are not afforded their ill-gotten gains, that innocent victims are compensated
for their losses to the fullest extent possible, and that the Department of
Justice possesses and devotes sufficient resources to collection efforts.
·
The collection
reforms principally rely upon: surcharges that provide an incentive to able
defendants to promptly pay civil and criminal judgments, fines and restitution
owed to the federal government and victims; and offsets, subtracted from the
amount of the debt due the federal agency, to partially defray the Department
of Justice’s collection costs. The
National Association of Assistant United States Attorneys estimates that these
reforms will provide at least $832 million in new funds to DOJ from FY07 to
FY12.
- 5% Criminal
Surcharge – Impose a 5% surcharge
on criminal debtors who do not pay fines and restitution within 15 days
of judgment.
- 5% Civil
Surcharge – Impose of 5% surcharge
on civil debtors who do not pay civil debt within 15 days of judgment.
Federal agencies are still entitled to 100% of principle and interest. It would replace the 10% civil enforcement
surcharge which only applies to selected actions.
- Increase
Civil Offset to 5% - Add 2%
to the current 3% of civil recoveries now paid to the DOJ Working Capital
Fund. The additional 2% would go
into the Enhanced Financial Recovery Fund.
- 5% Offset
on Federal Restitution – The
5% offset on federal restitution would match the 5% civil offset and apply
only to criminal judgments where restitution is due a federal agency.
- Increased
Special Assessments – Special
assessments, which are collected before fines and restitutions, would
be increased across-the-board. For
example, the special assessment would increase from $100 to $200.
Title II --
Assistant United States Attorney Retirement
- Title II provides parity between the retirement
benefits of AUSAs and those of federal law enforcement officers. It will strengthen the Department of Justice’s
ability to win critical cases by better ensuring the retention of skilled,
experienced federal prosecutors.
- Improving the AUSA retirement benefit will confront
the growing exodus of top-flight prosecutors from the Department of Justice,
which is harming the Department’s ability to prosecute terrorists, gang
leaders, drug kingpins, intellectual pirates, and white collar criminals.
The average line AUSA remains with DOJ for only 8 years, a critical loss
of litigation skill and experience by the government.
- DOJ internal studies and surveys have identified
the enhancement of the AUSA retirement benefit as the foremost remedy in
improving the AUSA retention rate. A
report
of the Attorney General’s Advisory Committee concluded: “Clearly,
career AUSAs should be authorized to receive retirement benefits afforded
all of the other members of the federal law enforcement community since
the majority of AUSA responsibilities relate to the investigation, apprehension
or detention of individuals suspected or convicted of criminal laws of the
United States.”
- Elevating the AUSA retirement benefit also will
assist DOJ in its current effort to realign the skillbase of the AUSA workforce
of 5,400 AUSAs in 93 U.S. Attorney Offices.
Recent DOJ workforce realignment efforts have been only modestly
successful, with cash incentive retirement offers prompting a limited response
among eligible AUSAs.
- Title II will bring the retirement benefits of AUSAs
into line with the retirement benefits of thousands of federal law enforcement
employees, including Special Agents of the FBI, Secret Service, IRS and
DEA, deputy U.S. Marshals, probation and pretrial service officers
and Bureau of Prison employees. When Congress originally granted a better
retirement benefit to law enforcement personnel, AUSAs served as political
appointees, outside the purview of the improvement.
- A preliminary
CBO estimate of S. 2076 in the 109th Congress, addressing
only the enhanced AUSA retirement benefit, projected a cost of $944 million
over 10 years, or $94 million a year. That cost is expected to be largely offset
by the funds generated by the collection reforms under Title 1.
As Sen. Patrick Leahy has said,
“The result of the creative efforts to fund these benefits in an alternative
manner is that the Department of Justice will, through its duties as the
Nation's law enforcement agency, be able to provide the benefits its employees
deserve at little or no cost to the taxpayer.”
To cosponsor S. 1729
Contact Matt Virkstis (Sen. Patrick Leahy), 224-7492
To cosponsor H.R. 2878
Contact Chanelle Hardy (Rep. Artur Davis), 225-2665