Rep. Artur Davis Introduces H.R. 2878

On June 27, 2007, Rep. Artur Davis (D-AL) introduced H.R. 2878, a bill to amend titles 18 and 28 of the United States Code to provide for the prompt payments of debts owed to the United States and the victims of crime; and to amend title 5 United States Code, to provide to assistant United States attorneys the same retirement benefits as are afforded to Federal law enforcement officers. There are 36 cosponsors.

On June 28, 2007, Senator Patrick Leahy [D VT] and Senator Thad Cochran [R MS] introduced S. 1729, companion legislation to H.R. 2878. Answers to some of the questions about the new legislation are published here. Additional questions should be sent to staff@naausa.org.

NAAUSA members are urged to contact their Representative by phone or in writing and ask him/her to cosponsor H.R. 2878.

To call your lawmaker contact the Capitol at 202-224-3121and ask for the office of your Representative. Find the name of your Representative at www.house.gov. When the Representative's staff answers, say:

Hi, My name is __________________ and I live in Rep. ________________ district. I am calling to urge Rep. ____________________ to cosponsor H.R. 2878, a bill to improve the retirement benefits of Assistant U.S. Attorneys.

NAAUSA members are encouraged to write to their Representative and Senators to ask that they cosponsor the collections/retirement legislation.

Sample paragraphs for a request for cosponsor letter follow.

Please put your name and address at the top of your letter.

Dear    

            As one of your constituents, I am writing to ask you to cosponsor H.R. 2878, (S. 1729 if writing to Senators) the Enhanced Financial Recovery and Equitable Retirement Treatment Act of 2007, legislation that will enhance the federal government’s capacity to collect court judgments, fines and restitution, and assist in the collection of billions of dollars that are currently going uncollected.  Equally important, the legislation will strengthen the retirement benefits of Assistant United States Attorneys to improve the government’s capacity to retain skilled and experienced federal prosecutors. 

            I have been an Assistant United States Attorney for XX years.  During that time I have (insert one or two paragraphs about experience, including any high-profile cases worked and/or fines and restitution collected)

The following are suggested paragraphs to be included in your letter to your Representative or Senators

United States Attorney Offices are responsible for criminal and civil debt collection efforts that result annually in billions of dollars that are turned over to federal agencies and crime victims. In FY 2006, United States Attorneys Offices collected over $4.28 billion, more than twice the total budget of all US Attorney Offices.  However, there are still billions of dollars left to be recovered, sums not collected due to infirmities in the law and competing priorities.  “The Enhanced Financial Recovery and Equitable Treatment Act of 2007,” will improve and encourage the Department of Justice efforts to collect restitution for the victims of crime and to collect debts owed the United States through a series of reforms, including the association of the costs of collection with those who owe the Government judgments, fines or restitution.  The measure also responds to criticism by the Government Accountability Office that the Department of Justice is not aggressively pursuing the collection of debts and penalties.

            In addition to improving debt collection, this bill also will significantly aid the nation’s law enforcement efforts in another important way.  While Congress and the media have focused on the controversies surrounding U.S. Attorneys, my colleagues and I have continued to prosecute terrorists, drug king pins, organized crime figures, intellectual pirates, gang leaders and other perpetrators of harm.  However, our moral has suffered because there are questions raised about the objectivity of the work of the U.S. Attorney’s Offices. 

           Despite our vital role in prosecuting criminals and defending the United States in civil litigation, Assistant United States Attorneys are unfairly short-changed in our retirement benefits.  The retirement benefits of AUSAs are considerably less than their law enforcement counterparts within the FBI, Secret Service, DEA, U.S. Marshals Service, and Bureau of Prisons.  It is time to end that inequity and bring the retirement benefits of AUSAs into line with thousands of other employees in the federal law enforcement community.  Passing this legislation will be a real morale boost for all AUSAs since it will be a strong message by Congress of its support for career AUSAs.

           Besides fairness itself, improving the retirement benefits of AUSAs will have another beneficial purpose.  It will stem the loss of many AUSAs to the lure of higher pay and benefits in private legal practice.  The average line AUSA leaves the Department of Justice after only eight years, just as we are hitting our professional stride, and thereby undermine the Department’s capability to win important cases in court.  This legislation will help dampen the tide of attrition and bolster the Department of Justice’s litigation know-how, especially in increasingly complex and demanding trial cases.

 

                         

 

 

                                                           

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 
 

Rationale for Enhanced Retirement for Assistant United States Attorneys

In recent years, the role of Assistant United States Attorneys has become increasingly crucial to the effective implementation by the United States of its number one priority – keeping Americans safe from foreign and domestic terrorism.

In each of the 94 United States Attorneys Offices around this nation, Assistant United States Attorneys advise and direct the Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTF), which are comprised of federal state, county and local law enforcement agencies joined together to coordinate the prevention of domestic terrorism, the response to terrorist threats, and if necessary, to terrorist actions. Think of Zaccharias .Mousoui and there appears an image of a terrorist prevented from heinous acts. Think of John Walker Lindh, and there is an image of youthful arrogance gone awry with tragic consequences for America. Think of Timothy McVey, and there is an image of the horror of Oklahoma City, and yet too, the image of the rule of law while a nation sought and succeeded in fairly and expeditiously punishing the offender. All of these actions required the skill of Assistant United States Attorneys, professionals dedicated to protecting America and supporting the rule of law.

Often the Assistant United States Attorneys who prosecute these criminals, and other breaking federal laws, are threatened – and the lives of their spouses and children are threatened.

Our nation has discovered that terrorists fund their activities by selling illicit narcotics, by extortion, by routine white collar frauds, by tax evasion, by fraudulent charitable activities and by money laundering. Assistant United States Attorneys are the lynch pin in all such investigations and prosecutions. Warrants cannot be issued, arrests cannot be made, wiretaps cannot be procured and prosecutions will not be had without the Assistant United States Attorney at the ready to combat this wide range of illegal activity.

Probation Officers who prepare sentencing reports for judges and supervise those on probation, Pretrial Services Officers who investigate offenders’ eligibility for bail, law enforcement agents who investigate criminal and civil violations, deputy marshals, corrections officers and yes, even the cooks in the prisons – all receive enhanced retirement in recognition of the dangerous and high-stress nature of their work. Left out of this law enforcement benefit plan – only the Assistant United States Attorneys.

Currently, there are over 5500 AUSAs who work in 93 separate offices throughout the country. These AUSAs are the United States Attorneys’ principal support for ensuring that the laws are faithfully executed. However, of this number, only a handful stay to retirement - for 2002, only 26 Assistant United States Attorneys stayed to retirement. For 2001 the number was 29.

AUSAs leave public practice for financial reasons more than anything else. DOJ statistics consistently reflect that experienced prosecutors, that is prosecutor with between 6 and 15 years experience, comprise the largest group of those leaving public service: between 60-70% of those leaving every year come from this experience level. These are exactly the experienced AUSAs needed to prosecute terrorists, organized crime cases, drug cartels and corporate fraud cases.


Prior Cosponsors of AUSA retirement legislation

 

Alabama
R
ep. Bachus, Spencer [R] 9/9/2003
Rep. Cramer, Bud [D] 10/8/2003

Arizona
Rep Grijalva, Raul M. [D] 9/9/2003
Rep. Pastor, Ed [D] 6/18/2003
Rep. Wilson, Heather [R] 10/28/2003 

California
Rep. Berman, Howard L. [D] 6/15/2004
Rep. Cunningham, Duke [R] 1/27/2004
Rep. Davis, Susan A. [D] 12/8/2003
Rep. Filner, Bob [D] 6/9/2003
Rep. Harman, Jane [D] 9/9/2003
Rep. Honda, Michael [D] 9/24/2003
Rep. Lantos, Tom [D] 6/18/2003
Rep. Lee, Barbara [D] 9/9/2003
Rep. Lofgren, Zoe [D] 9/9/2003
Rep. Miller, George [D] 6/25/2003
Rep. Napolitano, Grace [D] 5/22/2003
Rep. Roybal-Allard, Lucille [D] 12/8/2003
Rep. Sanchez, Linda T. [D] 6/15/04
Rep. Solis, Hilda L. [D] 6/23/04
Rep. Schiff, Adam B. [D] 12/8/2003
Rep. Stark, Fortney Pete [D] 7/10/2003
Rep. Thompson, Mike [D] 10/8/2003
Rep. Woolsey, Lynn [D] 5/22/2003 

Colorado
Rep. Tancredo, Thomas G. [R] 6/23/04
Rep. Udall, Mark [D] 6/2/2004

Connecticut
Rep. DeLauro, Rosa [D] 6/25/2003
Rep. Simmons, Rob [R] 6/18/2003 

District of Columbia
Rep. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D] 9/24/2003 

Florida
Rep. Bilirakis, Michael [R] 10/8/2003
Rep. Boyd, Allen [D] 6/25/2003
Rep. Brown, Corrine [D] 5/22/2003
Rep. Davis, Jim [D] 6/9/2003
Rep. Deutsch, Peter [D] 6/17/2003
Rep. Diaz-Balart, Lincoln [R] 5/22/2003
Rep. Diaz-Balart, Mario [R] 10/28/2003
Rep. Foley, Mark [R] 9/9/2003
Rep. Hastings, Alcee [D] 4/20/2004
Rep. Mica, John L. [R] 6/8/2004
Rep. Meek, Kendrick [D] 5/22/2003
Rep. Shaw, E. Clay, Jr. [R] 7/10/2003
Rep. Wexler, Robert [D] 5/22/2003 

Georgia
Rep. Burns, Max [R] 6/25/2003
Rep. Bishop, Sanford [D] 10/8/2003
Rep. Gingrey, Phil [R] 4/30/2004

Hawaii
Rep. Abercrombie, Neil [D] 6/8/2004
Rep. Case, Ed [D] 12/8/2003

Illinois
Rep. Biggert, Judy [R] 6/18/2003
Rep. Davis, Danny K. [D] 6/17/2003
Rep. Gutierrez, Luis [D] 9/9/2003
Rep. LaHood, Ray [R] 1/27/2004
Rep. Lipinski, William [D] 9/9/2003
Rep. Manzullo, Donald A. [R] 1/27/2004

Rep. Shimkus, John [R] 4/30/2004
Rep. Weller, Jerry [R] 5/22/2003 

Indiana
Rep. Carson, Julia [D] 6/25/2003
Rep. Hostettler, John N. [R] 7/10/2003

Iowa
Rep. Latham, Tom [R] 6/25/2003
Rep. Leach, Jim [R] 6/25/2003 

Kansas
Rep. Moore, Dennis [D] 6/8/2004
Rep. Tiahrt, Todd [R] 7/10/2003
 

Kentucky
Rep. Lewis, Ron [R] 6/17/2003
Rep. Rogers, Harold [R] 6/15/2004

Louisiana
Rep. Baker, Richard [R] 6/25/2003
Rep. John, Christopher [D] 12/8/2003
Rep. Vitter, David [R] 11/6/2003

Maryland
Rep. Bartlett, Roscoe G. [R] 9/9/2003
Rep. Cummings, Elijah [D] 4/30/2004
Rep. Gilchrest, Wayne [R] 10/8/2003
Rep. Wynn, Albert Russell [D] 12/8/2003

Massachusetts
Rep. Delahunt, William [D] 6/25/2003
Rep. Lynch, Stephen [D] 5/22/2003
Rep. Meehan, Martin T. [D] 3/16/2004
Rep. Neal, Richard E. [D] 6/17/2003
Rep. Olver, John W. [D] 10/28/2003
Rep. Tierney, John F. [D] 6/2/2004

Michigan
Rep. Camp, Dave [R] 6/17/2003
Rep. Conyers, John [D] 5/22/2003
Rep. Dingell, John D. [D] 9/9/2003
Rep. Ehlers, Vernon J. [R] 7/10/2003
Rep. Kildee, Dale E. [D] 6/15/2004
Rep. Kilpatrick, Carolyn C. [D] 7/10/2003
Rep. Stupak, Bart [D] 6/25/2003

Mississippi
Rep. Thompson, Bennie [D] 4/20/2004

Missouri
Rep. McCarthy, Karen [D] 3/16/2004

New Jersey
Rep. Holt, Rush [D] 10/8/2003
Rep. Menendez, Robert [D] 6/25/2003
Rep. Pascrell, Bill [D] 10/8/2003

New Mexico
Rep. Udall, Tom [D] 7/10/2003
Rep. Wilson, Heather [R] 10/28/2003

New York
Rep. Ackerman, Gary [D] 7/10/2003
Rep. Crowley, Joseph [D] 6/18/2003
Rep. Maloney, Carolyn [D] 9/9/2003
Rep. Nadler, Jerrold [D] 6/18/2003
Rep. Owens, Major R. [D] 11/6/2003
Rep. Quinn, Jack [R] 2/25/2004
Rep. Slaughter, Louise [D] 9/24/2003
Rep. Towns, Edolphus [D] 6/25/2003
Rep. Walsh, James [R] 6/25/2003

North Carolina
Rep. Miller, Brad [D] 1/27/2004
Rep. Price, David E. [D] 9/9/2003

North Dakota
Rep. Pomeroy, Earl [D] 5/22/2003

Ohio
Rep. Brown, Sherrod [D] 11/6/2003
Rep. Jones, Stephanie [D] 5/22/2003
Rep. Kucinich, Dennis J. [D] 11/6/2003
Rep. LaTourette, Steve [R] 5/22/2003
Rep. Ryan, Timothy J. [D] 7/10/2003

Oklahoma
Rep. Sullivan, John [R] 10/28/2003

Oregon
Rep. Blumenauer, Earl [D] 6/18/2003
Rep. DeFazio, Peter [D] 9/24/2003
Rep. Hooley, Darlene [D] 12/8/2003
Rep. Wu, David [D] 6/25/2003

Pennsylvania
Rep. English, Phil [R] 7/10/2003
Rep. Gerlach, Jim [R] 7/10/2003
Rep. Greenwood, James [R] 4/30/2004
Rep. Hoeffel, Joseph, III [D] 6/25/2003
Rep. Murphy, Tim [R] 9/9/2003
Rep. Platts, Todd [R] 6/25/2003

Rhode Island
Rep. Kennedy, Patrick [D] 9/24/2003

South Carolina
Rep. Wilson, Joe [R] 4/30/2004

Tennessee
Rep. Gordon, Bart [D] 2/25/2004
Rep. Jenkins, William L. [R] 12/8/2003
Rep. Wamp, Zach [R] 9/24/2003 

Texas
Rep. Bonilla, Henry [R] 12/8/2003
Rep. Frost, Martin [D] 6/25/2003
Rep. Gonzalez, Charles [D] 9/9/2003
Rep. Green, Gene [D] 6/25/2003
Rep. Hall, Ralph M. [TX] 3/16/2004
Rep. Hinojosa, Ruben [D] 10/8/03
Rep. Jackson-Lee, Sheila [D] 6/25/2003
Rep. Lampson, Nick [D] 6/25/2003
Rep. Reyes, Silvestre [R] 10/8/2003
Rep. Rodriguez, Ciro [D] 4/30/2004
Rep. Sandlin, Max [D] 9/9/2003
Rep. Sessions, Pete [R] 5/22/2003
Rep. Turner, Jim [D] 9/9/2003

Utah
Rep. Bishop, Rob [R] 9/9/2003
Rep. Cannon, Chris [R] 6/18/2003
Rep. Matheson, Jim [D] 5/22/2003

Virginia
Rep. Boucher, Rick [D] 5/22/2003
Rep. Goode, Virgil [R] 4/30/2004
Rep. Moran, James [D] 6/25/2003
Rep. Schrock, Edward [R] 10/28/2003
Rep. Wolf, Frank [R] 6/9/2003

Washington
Rep. Baird, Brian [D] 7/10/2003
Rep. Larsen, Rick [D] 7/10/2003
Rep. McDermott, Jim [D] 10/8/2003

West Virginia
Rep. Mollohan, Alan [D] 6/25/2003

Wisconsin
Rep. Baldwin, Tammy [D] 6/15/2004


 

 


How Much Money am I Losing?

Assistant US Attorney Retirement Comparisons

NAAUSA members must take an active role in securing House cosponsors for AUSA retirement legislation.

The following comparisons show the value of law enforcement officer retirement to AUSAs:

 

High-Three
$75,000
50 years old, 20 years service

High-Three
$100,000
57 years old, 25 years of service

 

Regular Retirement
Annuity

LEO Retirement
Annuity

Difference

Regular Retirement
Annuity

LEO Retirement
Annuity

Difference

CSRS $24,504 $37,500 $12,996 $46,248 $60,000 $13,752
FERS $15,000 $25,500 $10,500 $18,852 $39,000 $20,148

Source: From calculations by Government Retirement and Benefits, Inc., 5999 Stevenson Ave., Suite 403, Alexandria, VA 22304

>
Retirement Legislation Introduction
>
Retirement Legislation Cosponsors
>
AUSA Retirement Comparisons

 

     
 

(T) 1-800-455-5661
(F) 1-800-528-3492

info@naausa.org


12427 Hedges Run Dr.
Suite 104
Lake Ridge VA 22192

   
 
  © 2001 National Association of Assistant US Attorneys. All rights reserved