|
Statement
of Representative Ed Bryant Civil Service Subcommittee
H.R.
583, The Assistant United States Attorneys Retirement Benefit Equity
Act of 1999
September 9,
1999
Thank you, Mr.
Chairman.
Mr. Chairman
and Members of the Subcommittee, I appreciate your holding this
hearing today and I am pleased to be able to testify on behalf of
the National Association of Assistant United States Attorneys in
support of H.R. 583, the Assistant United States Attorneys Retirement
Benefit Equity Act of 1999.
As a former
United States Attorney from the Western District of Tennessee, I
have first-hand experience and knowledge about AUSAs and the integral
role they play in federal law enforcement.
Currently,
there are more than 4700 AUSAs who work in 93 separate offices throughout
the country. These AUSAs are the United States Attorneys principal
support for ensuring that the laws are faithfully executed. In today's
environment of sophisticated white collar crime, domestic and foreign
terrorism, international narcotics trafficking, espionage, government
program fraud, organized crime and labor racketeering, the role
of the AUSA has evolved to include substantial investigative duties.
AUSAs control and direct the most crucial investigative tool in
the criminal justice system - the Grand Jury. AUSAs oversee and
participate in the investigative activities of federal law enforcement
officers working on major prosecutions, and review and approve complex
search warrants and applications for wiretaps. In multi-agency cases,
the AUSA functions as supervisor of the agents' activities, a particular
challenge since there is no line authority from AUSA to agent.
Civil AUSAs
defend lawsuits brought against federal agents in connection with
their performance of their law enforcement duties. Prisoner litigation
is an additional aspect of the civil AUSAs practice. Civil AUSAs
represent the government in suits brought by those who wish to obstruct
government operations. AUSAs have been threatened in this context,
had false liens filed against their property, and have had false
Form 1099s filed with the Internal Revenue Service.
The increasing
complexity of federal investigations and the resulting criminal
and civil litigation has spawned a relatively new phenomenon - the
career Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA). Unfortunately, as
more and more AUSAs seek careers within the Department of Justice,
the Department has not reacted to provide the professional benefits
deemed routine in the highly stressful law enforcement community.
As you know,
under the current retirement system, federal law enforcement agents
are eligible to retire at 50% of their "high-three" salaries
at age 50, with 20 years of service. Currently AUSAs are the only
employees in the criminal justice system who do not receive this
law enforcement retirement, which recognizes the stressful occupations
associated with fighting crime, and the physical and mental challenges
which wear down body and mind at an accelerated pace. Originally
authorized in 1948, federal law enforcement retirement benefits
were intended to liberalize retirement provisions in order to enable
agents and investigators to retire at age 50, while still physically
fit. In enacting that legislation, Congress recognized the stressful,
sometimes dangerous, work performed by the law enforcement officers
as well as the need for career investigators in the federal government.
At that time, there were no "career" AUSAs and, therefore,
there was no reason for their inclusion in the statute. Since then,
however, circumstances have changed significantly.
Only during
the 1980s did AUSAs begin to remain employed by the Department until
retirement on any regular basis. In the last two decades, the position
of AUSA has evolved from being largely political, where it was routine
for all AUSAs to resign upon the appointment of a new United States
Attorney. Then, newly employed attorneys inherited entire caseloads
of ongoing prosecutions. This disruption badly damaged the continuity
of investigations and prosecutions, both civil and criminal.
Congress has
recognized the importance of maintaining an experienced force of
career AUSAs. In 1990 the Civil Service Due Process Amendments extended
the procedural protections of the Civil Service Reform Act to AUSAs.
No longer constantly in jeopardy of being replaced for political
reasons, more and more AUSAs are remaining in the Department of
Justice for their careers, thus ensuring that the government is
getting the best representation.
For retirement
purposes, the "law enforcement officer" designation is
not limited to only line agents who are on the street involved in
day-to-day investigative work. The "law enforcement officer"
designation includes: FBI agent-attorneys who are stationed at FBI
headquarters, Federal prison guards, Federal Probation Officers,
Federal Pretrial Services Officers and even accountants, cooks,
secretaries, and attorneys of the Bureau of Prisons. In fact, from
the time that an individual first comes into contact with the federal
criminal justice system until the time that individual leaves the
federal criminal justice system, the only individuals that he comes
into contact with who are not afforded "law enforcement officer"
status for retirement purposes is the Federal Judge who sentences
him and the AUSA who prosecutes him. All other contacts are all
designated "law enforcement officers" for the purposes
of retirement. And, it should be noted, the federal judiciary has
its own enhanced retirement system.
Data from the
Department of Justice reveals that length of service for AUSAs was
seven years for 1990 through 1992, and eight years for 1993 through
1996. This trend should be encouraged. By comparison, the length
of service for other Justice employees was 19 years in 1996. The
American public is best served by experienced, career oriented AUSAs,
not only when prosecuting such cases as the World Trade Center and
Oklahoma City bombings, but also in defending the United States
against drug traffickers, the perpetrators of civil health care
fraud and the host of other violators who threaten the safety of
our community and endanger our economy.
Given the increasing
complexity of legislation dealing with offenses against the United
States, and the increasing sophistication of lawbreakers, the United
States Department of Justice requires the services of experienced,
seasoned professional Assistant United States Attorneys to protect
the interests of the American people. The work is demanding, stressful
and often fraught with danger. AUSAs, both civil and criminal, face
stress and strain on mind and body to a degree equal to and in some
cases exceeding that faced by others included in the federal law
enforcement retirement system.
The time has
come for the Congress to recognize AUSAs for what they are - an
essential part of the front line defenders of safety and justice
in America. The AUSA should no longer be the only member of the
federal criminal justice system denied law enforcement retirement.
And I thank
the chair.
|